|
||
|
Editorial Calendar
Media Planner Reprints Issue/Article Orders Issue Index Current Advertisers Contact |
Get on TrackA Growing Movement Believes that Transit-Oriented Development Paves the Way for New Growth. By Lynn R. Otte and Reed Lee "Bye-Bye Suburban Dream" heralded a recent Newsweek magazine cover, "15 Ways to Fix the Suburbs." It may have come as a surprise to those who thought the nation's suburbs were doing fine, but the article focused on some very real problems: unchecked growth without corresponding economic benefit; how much it costs the average family to drive from home to work to school to store (almost 18 percent of the family budget), as well as the plight of suburban slums-older, closer-in suburbs that have been abandoned in favor of those farther out. Add to these the better-known complaints of increasing air pollution, traffic congestion, and the disappearance of undeveloped land, and the scope widens to a national concern. While suburban woes are often residential in nature, commercial markets have followed the path of the people out of the city, along corridors of commerce-consider the strip centers, malls, industrial parks, and corporate headquarters and campuses that line major suburban arteries. Commercial properties are an integral part of the suburban landscape and can experience the same problems as residential real estate when the development moves out farther: difficulty in leasing or selling properties. By rethinking the American pattern of growth and the concept of personal transportation, some of this problem becomes fixable either through new development or retrofitted development. One response is the emergence of transit-oriented development (TOD), which reduces dependence on the automobile by providing quick and easy access to other forms of transportation. TOD emphasizes land use and transportation relationships of urban development, parking management, and the importance of the pedestrian environment in development decisions. A fairly broad TOD definition includes three characteristics: higher density land uses; a mix of land uses (commercial developments integrated with residential developments); and transit-accessibility. A Viable Alternative TOD projects represent a response to the changing demographics of the marketplace that typical development has missed. The post-World War II suburban model designed around mom and the kids at home and at school in the suburbs and dad downtown at his job no longer fits the reality for most Americans. Mixed-use developments that offer stores, restaurants, movie theaters, and offices in close proximity to residential units and that can be reached by car, foot, bicycle, or mass transit are TOD's leading edge. These transit villages, so-called because they are designed around a transit stop, save precious travel time and open up commercial and retail establishments to those who do not have cars. While there is not an extensive or long-term track record for TOD projects, early indications are that TOD projects sell and lease at a premium. The growth of commercial development near Washington, D.C., Metro stations such as Rosslyn, Crystal City, Pentagon City, and Ballston, along with the success of primarily residential projects such as Seaside, Florida; Kentlands, Maryland; and mixed-use projects such as Laguna West, California, point to the potential for the success of TOD projects. Old Concept, New Emphasis Dependence on the automobile has been growing in America for more than 45 years, since the end of World War II. This situation has been aided by the absence of public transportation in many communities nationwide-an absence that, in some cases, was "planned" in the community's design through land use decisions and zoning. Only recently, in light of problems of traffic congestion and air pollution, have the perils of such decisions become apparent. It is very difficult to provide mass transit effectively for decentralized development. Low-density/single-use projects almost require autos for transportation. Planning that does not consider the pedestrian will deter use of mass transit. Examples of TOD There are two major types of TODs: those developed around new transit systems, and those that are retrofitted into older systems. The development around the Washington, D.C., Metro stations on the Ballston-Rosslyn corridor in Arlington County, Virginia, is a good example of TOD designed around a new transit system. When the Metro rail lines extended into this suburban area, Arlington County focused on high-density residential and commercial development around the Metro stations. In Ballston, in particular, a mix of private and public-private partnerships created a new downtown on 260 acres of land surrounding the Metro station. Halfway through the approved development, the area has added 5,000 residential units, 7 million square feet of office space, and 1.1 million square feet of retail space. A good example of retrofit is the recent redevelopment of downtown Elmhurst, Illinois, around a Metra commuter train station. The city of Elmhurst solicited developers interested in mixed-use development through a request-for-proposal process. It also provided incentives by assembling city property and selling it at reduced cost. Elmhurst worked with Metra and the Illinois Department of Transportation to provide infrastructure improvements. In addition, the city provided a low-interest loan to a theater owner to upgrade and renovate that property, which helped to stimulate additional retail development. Development Features
Creating a Transit-Friendly Environment TOD offers developers benefits and advantages such as reduced traffic congestion, site attractiveness, density or height bonuses (made available as incentives by municipalities), and higher levels of foot traffic for commercial property. In designing projects for large parcels of land, developers have the opportunity to incorporate guidelines that can make the development more transit-compatible. For instance, developers should consider convenient access for transit riders and pedestrians, including bus stops, shelters, and sidewalks close to the entrance of the development and incorporating transit rail stations into the development. Tactics for Implementing TOD
Early, efficient coordination and communication among the developer, municipal staffs, transportation agencies, and the community are essential in the TOD process. Zoning codes and plan approval criteria should be reviewed to identify requirements that may impede TOD. In addition, developers can:
Transit-oriented development offers developers (and city planners) the opportunity to be on the cutting edge of urban planning. |
Lynn R. Otte is manager of market development and Reed Lee is principal analyst for the Regional Transportation Authority in Chicago, Illinois. You can reach Otte at (312) 917-0706 and Lee at (312) 917-0753. The Regional Transportation Authority, 181 W. Madison, Chicago, Illinois, which provides financial planning and oversight of public transportation in northeastern Illinois, is committed to advancing the concepts of TOD through a variety of efforts. It sponsors TOD seminars and workshops for developers, consultants, and municipal officials. |